Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the
Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.
Sunday, May 09, 2004 |
Next Stop: The Bronx
Does it disconcert anyone else following the Angels that some of their key bats are so stubbornly cold against Tampa Bay? Shane Halter's fluke grand slam aside, over the last week, average, OBP, and SLG for the team:
| Player | Avg | OBP | SLG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guerrero | .346 | .414 | .462 |
| Figgins | .280 | .345 | .360 |
| Guillen | .480 | .536 | .840 |
| Eckstein | .167 | .286 | .208 |
| Glaus | .391 | .517 | .826 |
| Erstad | .273 | .333 | .364 |
| Kennedy | .227 | .292 | .227 |
| Benjie Molina | .364 | .391 | .591 |
| DaVanon | .182 | .400 | .182 |
I here include players with ten or more at bats. Some general comments:
- Eckstein... Eckstein... Eckstein... Mike may have to rest him during the New York series. Most of these at bats are against weak teams, too. I have similar words for Kennedy, whose early season is long forgotten now.
- Jeff DaVanon: the human walk machine. He can't hit for average, he's got some power, but man does that boy take walks. .400 OBP? Get outta here...
- When did Vlad suddenly turn into a very good singles hitter? If it wasn't for Glaus, and Guillen's sudden warmup, this would be a very different club indeed.
- Is anybody else worried that Tim Salmon might revert to April slump mode just in time for his return to action against the Yanks?
Newer› ‹Older
 |
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.