Saturday, July 31, 2004 |
Padres 3, Dodgers 2
It's certainly a glass of cold water in the face. Every close lead in late innings now becomes that much more of a question mark; do you force your starters to go longer, or do you rely more on weaker relievers? It's a tough question, but it all reminds me that, for all the disdain I've shown Bill Stoneman over the last year for his lack of imagination in acquiring players, perhaps he's not so dumb to avoid trading key minor leaguers for pieces that might not make sense even after they arrive, let alone making trades for the sake of trading. (For the introduction to how Stoneman thinks, read this.)
"My <expletive> doesn't work in the playoffs," Billy Beane is quoted to say in Moneyball. Will DePo's even work to get us there?
Update: Does that passed ball on Ross get past Lo Duca?
I don't know about you, but I root for the uniform and for the city/area. players come and go. You think they care any about loyalty? Sure, they'll talk about wanting to stay with a team, but what if you ask them to take a 50% paycut to make the team better? It's a 2 way street. Teams are going to treat players like commidities, trading them if it makes the organization better. And players are going to be mercenaries, where team loyalty comes only after salary.
Like everybody else, I absolutely loved Paul Lo Duca the Dodger. But he's gone, our team is arguably better, and as it stands, I now care more about a 1B named Choi and a SP named Penny more than some Marlin.
mattkew
Newer› ‹Older
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.