<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Friday, August 19, 2005

Mighty Casey

Count me into the group, at least part time, of Casey Kotchman skeptics. (You may find his minor league stats prior to 2005 here.) Despite his sudden and wholly unexpected home run surge since joining the big club, his first callup didn't impress, rookie non-strikeout records included. He barely hit in 2004, with a .226/.289/.276 line, making it abundently clear that he needed more time to develop in the minors, if nothing else. This year, more of the same, compounded by his early-season struggles in AAA, in a hitter's park and a hitter's league. Players have setbacks all the time, and it looked like Kotch was due for another year's worth of delay.

Well: his late home run surge has dulled some of the catcalls, but probably not all of them. With that in mind, let's inspect Casey's PECOTA card, where we see offensive comparables including --

That's seven All Stars, two Hall of Famers (and one more who is well on his way to Cooperstown), a flameout, several guys too young to know about yet, and a smattering of mediocrities. I've never been of the "trade Kotchman for something good" bandwagon, but anyone who is or was should look at his comparables. That's a list, if not of baseball royalty, then of some fine players.

Comments:
I think the issue is that people don't have a reasonable expectation of how careers develop. Not everyone comes out of the head of Zeus, fully formed.
 
I think the lower end is Grace; the upper end is more like Todd Helton, if you subtract a bit for playing half his games at Coors Canaveral.
 
"Kotchman hate?" From whom? I'd say there was worry (well placed, as he had shown no signs of developing power and had completely lost his discipline post last season’s cup-o-coffee), but I’ve never heard anyone suggest he was done.
 
And don't forget, Grace was a really good pitcher, too, for all of one inning. Wish I'd saved that video -- it was priceless.
 
Well, gee, Matt, it's not like he's actually getting those kinds of numbers against good pitchers, now is he? I mean, point taken about Erstad not getting those kinds of results against selfsame lousy D-Ray pitchers, but even so, it's fair to say he's got a ways to go yet before he's a reliable contributor.
 
I heard Joe McDonnell the other day say....

Something one never wants to read... Ever.
 
I don't think the Angels have a choice. But his strings of 0-fer games against Seattle and Oakland, and a complete blanking in the Toronto series, make me really nervous.
 
Also -- in re Wakefield, you'll notice it was a grooved "fastball", such as Tim reckons these things, that Kotch wailed out of the park. I just want to see him do it a bit longer before we start mentally penciling him into the three or five spots.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2