<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Friday, August 26, 2005

Pickoff Moves, Morning Edition

Plaschke On Bradley/Kent

Jon already has more on today's Plaschke column, full of heart-and-soul-and-good-clubhouse-guy-ology; not much to say other than I think Jon's reaching a little with some of the other players.

More on this from Ken Rosenthal.

MLB Turns Down Red Sox Doubleheader Request

MLB turned down the Red Sox' request to schedule a doubleheader with the Angels.

Update: Personally, I like deb of Venus's suggestion in the BTF thread that the Sox could forfeit the September 6 game.

Weaver, Morales Won't Get The Callup

In that same article, despite recent improvements, neither of Kendry Morales or Jered Weaver will be likely to get callups this year from AA.

Hendry Blames Himself

Well, that's refreshing. But really, wasn't it obvious at the beginning of the season? Starting perennially injured Todd Hollandsworth? A bullpen that's never been more than rickety? Another dose of unhealthy Nomar? Corporate ownership won't demand much accountability, and I'm not convinced Hendry knows what he's doing here. But at least he admits he knows that he doesn't know.

Comments:
Rob;

I have already tired of this story but I'm sure before it's over I will be absolutely sick of it.

DT's stance is commendable I suppose, taking up the cause of the poor mixed up and misunderstood Bradley, but I have little sympathy. He has been afforded a much greater opportunity than most, regardless of racial background and after squandering more than one of those opportunities, he continues to make the wrong choices.

Now the facts. No rumors.

Tracy and the coaching staff have done a masterful job of covering other "incidents" before this one. It was only a matter of time that the lid blew off.

The other players almost without exception have expressed their support for Kent and his constructive criticism in this matter. At least tacitly they agree that Bradley has not been playing all out. In a recent clubhouse meeting (Bradley absent) Kent was given a standing ovation when singled out by Tracy.

Prior to the injury announcement, which may have defused the whole incident for now, Tracy prohibited Bradley from entering the clubhouse for an indeterminate time.

Finally, Bradley is gone. Anyone who thinks or even hopes otherwise is naive. He is not favored player of management nor is he a favored teammate.

Rick
 
Whether or not Bradley is a good teammate is not what I'm concerned about, but rather how McCourt and DePodesta intend to implement their new "character-based" selection of players.

"Good" or "bad" chemistry seems to be determined only after the fact. Human personalities are too complex to figure out if they mesh well ahead of time. If we could all figure out who we got along with before the fact, there would be many fewer divorces.

Bob
 
Regardless, we aren't having this discussion if the Dodgers are leading the division.
 
I absolutely agree with both of you. The only caveat would be when you have a constant pattern to go by. At that point a player like Rocker, Everett etc... becomes a cancer and contaminates whichever team he ends up on. Then the GM has to be willing to sacrifice talent for attitude and hope he wins out in the end. Maybe easier said than done given the pressures of winning every year.

IMO Bradley is a cancer and is not likely to change his spots at this late date.

Rick
 
Philip Michaels of Idiots gets to do some braggin' for calling this onw way back when.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2