<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Overdue: Angelswin Interview With Scouting Director Eddie Bane

Actually, a nearly season-long series, whose lowlight is this exchange:
Q: Angelswin - Is Brandon Wood going to be working on his plate discipline this winter and next year? I noticed that his walks were up, but still a lot of strikeouts...

A: Eddie Bane - Personally I do not feel Brandon Wood has much of anything to work on in the off season. This young man has as good of makeup as anyone in the game and he has big time power. I do not worry about all these plate discipline issues that a lot of people seem to be hung up on. One thing society does is they like to tear people down after they built him up. Brandon had a great year in my mind in 2A and is right on track as far as helping our major league team. I think too much is made of a "general" hitting philosophy. I trust any and all of our hitters in the hands and minds of Ty Van Burkleo and then Mickey Hatcher once they get to the Big Leagues. Nobody works harder or has a better feel for hitters than those 2. Each hitter has to develop his own style and Wood and the others are just realizing that at this point. Besides I was a pitcher at the big league level and could not get many guys out so I thought everybody had a great hitting philosophy.

If your jaw isn't on the floor after reading the highlighted passage, I don't know what will get it there. This organization is adrift offensively. I used to think that firing Mickey Hatcher would suffice, provided it meant a stem-to-stern cleanout of the more cancerous elements of the Angels' hitting philosophy; now, I begin to dispair when I realize how entrenched is the idea that strikeouts somehow do not matter, and the pervasiveness of this attitude.

Comments:
Except that if you look at the Angels' offensive philosophy the past few years, they don't strike out much. It seems that the only current prospects that strike out a decent amount are Dallas, Brandon, and Napoli. If they end up anything like Salmon and Glaus (of the high K, high BB, high SLG style), they will be perfectly fine. If, alternatively, they end up more akin to GA (decent average, no BB, mediocre K, decent SLG style) they will also be fine. The problem lies in if they become guys that are low BB, high K, high SLG. Meanwhile, HK looks to follow GA. It appears that the organization has a philosphy of allowing hitters to find their way, and then trying to fix any holes that are left, and that's fine with me, since there are so many different ways one can be a good hitter.
 
The problem lies in if they become guys that are low BB, high K, high SLG.

You mean, like Brandon Wood, the guy whose strikeouts Bane claims we shouldn't be "hung up on"?
 
Angelswin asked the wrong guy about Brandon Wood. Brandon Wood's development is Tony Reagins' problem, not the scouting department's.

As a scout, Bane is right on - don't overdo the "hitting style" issue - if the guy can rake and he's projectable (however they determine), then draft him and sign him. That's Bane's job. I'll bet he's seen very little of Wood this year - that's why he gave such a vague answer.

ON THE OTHER HAND, I never like the idea that a player has "nothing to work on" - Wood can certainly improve on his strikeouts - it's just a question of how to do it without jeopardizing his progress as a power hitter. But that's an issue for the player development department, not the scouting department. Let's just hope that the player development department isn't so cavalier about Wood's development...
 
Maybe Bane should know that the fans who watched Brandon Wood ALL year long had the nickname for him of the "BIG K". It was almost a given that in any key situation he would strike out and at least once a game.
 
Oh my gosh, I can't believe that you disparaged the Angels! You are right though.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2