<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Sunday, May 06, 2007

Betemit's nth Stand: Dodgers 6, Braves 2

Ken Gurnick, on Wilson Betemit's game yesterday:
For those who saw Betemit's batting average coming into Saturday's play and cannot understand Little's patience, it comes from a combination of remembering what Betemit did last year -- 18 Major League home runs -- while knowing there's no obvious alternative to play third base.
Jon:
Of course, now Izuris and Aybar are both gone and both having years as miserable as Betemit's or worse. (Izturis has a .513 OPS in 20 games for the Cubs; Aybar is off Atlanta's active roster and dealing with personal problems.) Over the past year, the Dodgers haven't had a hot corner as much as they have a plutonium corner, destroying ballplayers from the inside out.
Ken Gurnick today:
Looking desperately for help at third base, the Dodgers announced on Sunday the promotion of Andy La Roche from Triple-A Las Vegas and made room for him by placing Marlon Anderson on the 15-day disabled list with a sore elbow.

La Roche wasn't exactly tearing up the Pacific Coast League with a .235 average and three home runs. But the Dodgers have been starting Wilson Betemit for most of this season and he is hitting .140 with only one home run, which he hit Saturday night as a pinch-hitter.

So what makes Wilson Betemit's pinch-hit solo homer last night unusual is that (a) Grady Little expressed enough interest in him actually playing to let him have a pinch-hit opportunity, especially after his vote of no-confidence only Friday, and (b) that he did something productive with the chance.

Not that anyone will take this to mean that Betemit will suddenly blossom with the Dodgers, or that Willy Aybar was a wasted trade. In hindsight, Aybar's confused career death spiral might have happened just as easily with the Dodgers as with the Braves, but with this lone exception: Aybar, at least, would still have options. Assuming Aybar stuck with the club but was awful, well, back to Las Vegas he goes. (Of course, if he did turn the same bizarro-land psycho player trick, it doesn't matter, because the Dodgers are still out a player.)

The Dodgers now replay the Adrian Beltre saga at third, only with half or maybe a third of the potential. It's hard to decide which is worse.

RecapYahoo Box

Labels: , ,


Comments:
I'm not sure what that remark about "potential" means. Adrian Beltre's potential is now known: He had the potential to have one great season after five mediocre ones, then sign a big contract and go back to having mediocre seasons. A player is only as good as he is; once his value is demonstrated he doesn't have any excess "potential" he hasn't used yet. Since Beltre's career OPS is something like .750, even with the great year, are you saying then that the best we could hope for from LaRoche is .375? LaRoche has potential, Beltre doesn't. We've aleady found out what kind of player Beltre actually is, now we find out what kind of player LaRoche is. (Robert Fiore)
 
I wasn't thinking so much about LaRoche as Betemit, but as with the string of second-, third-, or fourth-rate catchers that came through the Dodgers and the Dodgers' system (Koyie Hill, Dave Ross, Dioner Navarro) before the Dodgers settled on Russell Martin, the Dodgers may have to just deal with the reality that certain spots on the diamond are hard to fill, and not every player comes up Rookie of the Year.

As for LaRoche, I think he should be back at AAA fixing whatever ails his swing there. He's wasting away for the Dodgers on the major league roster.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2