Monday, July 09, 2007 |
Real Or Unreal: Two ESPN Guys Take On Great Seasons By Martin, Lackey, Saito
I would still hesitate to call Lackey a true ace, and I am quite skeptical that Lackey has improved enough to lower his ERA by 65 points and his WHIP by 11 points. Lackey was always a good-but-not-great pitcher whose best quality was health, and while this should definitely be a career year, he's likely pitching a little over his head. It's also worth noting that while he allowed 14 home runs in 217 2/3 innings last season, he already has allowed 11 home runs in 120 2/3 innings this season; that's still quite a low home run rate, but not close to last season's (or 2005, for that matter) despite his ERA being considerably lower.So, without any kind of backing, he tosses aside more-or-less steady progress (especially in crucial peripherals like WHIP and K/9) and claims Lackey's success is just due his health? There's certainly an argument about him tiring in the second half; he allows a .251/.313 /.386 against in the first half, but that spikes to .275/.337/.404 in the second half. Yet, it's a testimony to Lackey's competitiveness that those increases don't hurt him appreciably, as he has a 3.88 ERA in the first half and a 3.89 ERA in the second.
At least Madison can back up his comments about Saito with Saito's much higher 3.89 career ERA in Japan — but even that overlooks the fact that he was used all but exclusively as a starter there. In his two seasons used exclusively in relief, he posted a 2.13 ERA with 47 saves. (I will grant, however, that his 7.63 K/9 in Japan was nowhere near his insane 12.05 career rate he's posted in the U.S. That's headed down a bit this year, as he's striking out "only" 11.53 per nine, but that's still Eric Gagne territory.)
Labels: analysis, angels, dodgers
Newer› ‹Older
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.