<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Monday, December 20, 2004

The Big Trade In Review

Tom having hung my comments out on the yardarm without responding in the manner I requested* -- namely, some actual numerical analysis of the proposed Big Trade -- I feel obliged to deconstruct its latest incarnation, without resorting to cranky name-calling regarding its outcome. Reasonable men may disagree, and we all have the same desire, namely, to see the Dodgers win. For the record, I liked DePo's midseason trades, yet the bulk of its haul -- Penny and Choi -- must certainly be declared less than satisfactory thus far, and thus the trade itself a disappointment, though in fairness, this could not have been known in advance. Let us start with the latest known version of this trade, which no longer includes the Chisox, and thus most resembles the earliest version of the trade, plus the addition of Mike Koplove; to keep the audience at home abreast, a recap:

What The Dodgers Surrender

Shawn Green

PECOTA card (Projected 2005 VORP: 35)
Age on opening day: 32

Year   AB        Line      VORP
===============================
2002  582  .285/.385/.558  65.5
2003  611  .280/.355/.460  36.5
2004  590  .266/.352/.459  34.7

Green's 2002 was far more in line with his previous years than his 2003/2004, but even in today's bull market, he's noticeably overpaid at $16M/year. (ESPN lists it at $16.7M.) Green's 2003 and 2004 campaigns can hardly be classified as anything other than a disappointment, tempered with the knowledge that he played through a shoulder injury in 2003 and recovered from it in 2004. That we could be talking here about the 32-year-old Green could be traded anywhere speaks in some wise to the ability of DePodesta to get trades done.

Green's 2004 PECOTA card shows him with a 50th percentile VORP of 40.4, which was a good bit ahead of his actual 34.7. Next year, it projected him to be closer to three wins (30.0 VORP), but then, most of the comparable players were positive, and if he didn't meet his similarity index threshold at 50 (he has 48 comparables), he came awfully close. And there's ample room for optimism with Green, who had a greatly improved .281/.371/.529 line in the second half of 2004.

Brad Penny

PECOTA card (2005 projected VORP: 19)
Age on opening day: 26

Year    ERA    IP    K/9  K/BB  VORP
=====================================
2002   4.66  129.1  6.47  1.86   3.1
2003   4.13  196.1  6.33  2.46  28.2
2004*  3.15  143.0  6.99  2.47  36.6

*combined Florida and Los Angeles

Outside of his arm injury, Penny should be an interesting pitcher. I say "should" because that injury history has prevented him from realizing his potential, a fact that 2004 underscored in detail. Penny had biceps inflammation and blister problems in 2002; his nerve problems this year, which may or may not have been related, certainly didn't help his reputation of fragility. That DePodesta's so willing to unload the fruits of his midseason trade so soon makes me wonder if more extensive experience with the Dodgers medical corps isn't the reason for the move. Nonetheless, Penny's similarity index of 67 is pretty solid, and PECOTA shows him a 2-win pitcher for the remainder of his career, his outstanding 2003 postseason notwithstanding.

Yhency Brazoban

PECOTA card (2005 projected VORP: 2)
Age on opening day: 24

Year    ERA    IP    K/9  K/BB  VORP
=====================================
2004   2.48   32.2  7.44  1.80  11.7
The pitcher who made Dan Evans' trade of Kevin Brown look like an absolute masterstroke, Brazoban came out of nowhere and racked up a 2.48 ERA with respectable strikeout and K/BB rates, replacing the expensive and aging Mota. Only 24, Brazoban would be under the Dodgers' control for another five years. Relievers, so we're told, are the easiest pitchers to find replacements for, but this Moneyball homily unravels quickly, something the A's discovered this year to their chagrin.

As to Brazoban's future: interestingly, PECOTA assigns him only a 26 similarity index, and tags him as a replacement-level pitcher for his career. But all that means is PECOTA doesn't have a lot of data to work with, and his numbers could go up or down. Clearly, he was a good bit better than replacement level this year, but perhaps Tom's skepticism about his future is more warranted than I initially thought.

Kazuhisa Ishii

PECOTA card (projected 2005 VORP: 5)
Age on opening day: 31
Year    ERA    IP    K/9  K/BB  VORP
=====================================
2002   4.66  154.0  8.36  1.35  12.1
2003   3.86  147.0  8.57  1.39  21.0
2004   4.71  172.0  5.18  1.01  13.2

Ishii was done with the Dodgers after next year whether he pitched or not. Despite my earlier praise for his progress, that same turned out to be ephemeral, and he was not once, but twice removed from the rotation. Still, there are absolutely worse guys pitching in the majors today (viz. Aaron Sele or Shawn Estes), but their numbers rapidly dwindle. For a team far out of contention, Ishii may make an adequate three or four spot rotation pitcher, and therefore the Yankees should be able to flip him for something useful.

Brandon Weeden

Age on opening day: 21

Update: Weeden was acquired as a throw-in to the trade that brought Yhency Brazoban and Jeff Weaver to the Dodgers. He's got good but not great strikeout rates, and adequate control. Josh Boyd in BA's 2003 chat on the Yankees ranked him outside the organization's top ten, a pretty dubious distinction. BA previously thought he was the best prospect taken in the 2002 draft by the Yankees, a multisport athlete in high school. He doesn't represent a significant throw-in based on subsequent performance, but might make a useful reliever at some point.

What The Dodgers Get In Return

Javier Vazquez

PECOTA card (projected 2005 VORP: 42)
Age on opening day: 28

Year    ERA    IP    K/9  K/BB  VORP
=====================================
2002   3.90  230.1  6.99  3.65  29.8
2003   3.24  230.2  6.99  3.65 	52.9
2004   4.91  198.0  6.82  2.50  23.1

Early this year, I chided the Angels for failing to pick up the best available pitcher in the trade market, Javier Vazquez. Paul DePodesta clearly isn't letting an opportunity like this get away, not with the Yankees' sudden case of stomach cramps with their latest "pitcher of the future". There's a lot to be happy about here: Vazquez returns to the NL, and more, to Dodger Stadium, the rejuvenating properties of which have been remarked upon many a time. Over his career, Vazquez has had good to excellent strikeout rates, and even in Yankee Stadium, his strikeouts only declined a little, though his walks ascended. This may be a side effect of having Boston in his diet too often, as well as playing in the AL. (Update: and as The Fourth Outfielder observes, getting him the hell away from the poisonous effects of Mel Stottlemyre won't hurt, either. I had considered this but not written about it earlier myself.) Certainly, the Dodgers would have to be optimistic they can restore him to his previous level of performance at Montreal.

Dioner Navarro

PECOTA card (2005 projected VORP: 2)
Age on opening day: 21

Year   AB        Line      VORP
===============================
2004    7  .429/.429/.429   0.8

As I mentioned earlier in my initial, knocked-to-the-ground review of this proposal, Navarro was Baseball America's number one Yankees prospect in 2003, but bad things happened in 2004 and he slipped to number five. That isn't to say he's a bad prospect, but there's reasons to question how useful he'll be at the major league level. However, the Yankees are famous for nothing if not avoiding giving rookies playing time, so there's room for optimism, too. I don't necessarily agree with Tom that Navarro's status as a Yankee farmhand makes him underrated; if anything, the Yankees are all the more desperate to pawn off some bits and pieces for real live major leaguers, hence DePodesta's demand that the Dodgers receive at least two prospects from the Yankees. And PECOTA agrees with me, projecting Navarro to be only a league-average player, with the caveat that his similarity index is 15, an unusually low number. And, of course, this all before his poor showing this year.

Eric Duncan

Age on opening day: 20

Duncan's only played in single-A, but Baseball America liked him so much they named him the Yankees' best prospect, as well as their most significant trading chip. He's off to a great start: compare his .260/.351/.479 line in single-A Battle Creek with James Loney's .276/.337/.400 line at the same point, and you get the impression of a young power hitter with a good amount of patience. Insert the usual caveats about the kid not playing above single-A, your rookies may vary, etc.

Mike Koplove

PECOTA card (projected 2005 VORP: 15)
Age on opening day: 28

Year    ERA    IP    K/9  K/BB  VORP
=====================================
2002   3.36  61.2   6.71  2.00 	12.8
2003   2.15  37.2   6.45  2.70  12.5
2004   4.05  86.2   5.71  1.49 	12.9

Koplove, whose name sounds like either a porn star's or a guy who likes old movies, is, believe it or not, about as valuable by VORP as Yhency Brazoban. The problem is, he's done it in more innings than Brazoban, which means his MLVr is accordingly lower. He's projected to be about a win-and-a-half guy over his steadily declining career; his K/9 rate dropped nearly a whole point last year while he started giving up a bunch more walks. This is not a good sign, but translated from the hitter's park that is the BOB, he might be tolerable for a year or so in Chavez.

What Do It All Mean?

Dodgers

Lost:

               VORP
Player      2004  Proj.
=======================
Brazoban    11.5    2
Green       34.7   35
Ishii       13.2    5
Penny       36.6   20
            ---------
Total       82.8   62

Gained:

               VORP
Player      2004  Proj.
=======================
Vazquez     23.1    40
Koplove     12.9    15
Navarro      0.8     2
            ----------
Total:      36.8    57

So on the surface, this is an enormous loss for the Dodgers. The following points apply:

I wouldn't pull the trigger on this deal as written; DePodesta is right to so far hold up this trade before completing it, unless either he's (a) written off 2005 and/or (b) decided to make this a fire sale. So far, the noises are that DePo isn't writing off 2005, but then, that's what Beane's saying about moving Hudson and Mulder.

Update 12/21/04: Updated the Dodgers list to include throw-in Brandon Weeden.


*Yes, I know about this subsequent post, but if you're going to bag on me for failing to analyze the trade, be prepared to do it yourself first, buster.

Comments:
Would it change your opinion of the deal if the Dodgers were to ink JD Drew (or acquire some other "replacement" for Green) before it went through?

It seems like an ok move for the Dodgers to me, if only because it gives them some flexibility inside McCourt’s budget going forward. Sure, it probably signals that the DePo has given up on 2005, but I expected as much after Beltre bailed.
 
Richard -- just as I don't believe for one second that Beane has given up on 2005, neither do I entirely believe that DePo has given up on 2005, either. It could happen, and the fact that he's holding up the trade because of the Drew situation is evidence of that.

Tommy, Steve -- Steve's right, this trade can't be analyzed in a vacuum, but neither can it stand of its own accord, either. If you get Drew, it looks better. If you get Drew and some better pitching, you're even better off. So there's reasons for optimism, and that's coming from somebody who was panicing only a few days ago.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2