<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Tuesday, December 14, 2004

For The Byrd, Roamin' Ramon, Moseleying Along

Thanks to Richard for this AP story: Byrd was signed for a one-year contract, $4.5M. Meantime, Ramon Ortiz and his 4.43 ERA heads off to the Reds, where he will no longer face the DH. In return, the Angels get the Reds' 2000 first-round draft pick (34th overall) Dustin Moseley. Moseley had a 4.65 ERA in 12 starts with the AAA Louisville Bats in the Southern League. His 6.03 K/9 and 4.27 BB/9 strike me as being respectively insufficiently high and low. Baseball America ranked him the fourth best prospect in Cincy's system last year. Here's BA's 2003 scouting report on him:
Age: 22 [Note: birthday 12/26/81] B-T: R-R. Ht.: 6-4. Wt.: 200.
Drafted: HS—Texarkana, Ark., 2000 (1st round supplemental).
Signed by: Jimmy Gonzales.

Background: Moseley signed late in 2000 for $930,000 and has advanced rapidly, earning midseason promotions during each of the last two seasons and reaching Triple-A at age 21.

Strengths: Moseley’s mature knack for pitching has enabled him to move swiftly up the ladder. While he’s not overpowering with his 88-92 mph fastball, he has plus movement and manipulates the ball to both sides of the plate with a cutter and two-seamer. His 77-81 mph curveball with 12-to-6 break and his deceptive sinking changeup are among the best in the organization. His delivery is clean and effortless, potentially allowing him to add to his fastball.

Weaknesses: Because he doesn’t have plus velocity, Moseley has to rely on location and setting up hitters. Scouts say he doesn’t have a true out pitch, so he won’t be able to carry a pitching staff.

The Future: Though his ceiling is limited, Moseley is a good bet to enjoy a long and productive career in the majors. He reminds scouts of control artists like Rick Reed and Bob Tewksbury. He’ll start 2004 in Triple-A and could help the Reds rotation before the all-star break.

Clearly that never happened, so I'm left wondering why he didn't do better. His AA numbers were substantially better (2.66 ERA, 7.61 K/9, 4.00 K/BB, 47.1 IP, 3-2 in 8 starts), so there's reason to think he could improve here.

Update: Now on angels.mlb.com. The headline also claims that INF Alfredo Amezega was DFA'd, but doesn't mention this anywhere in the body text.


Comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2