<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Monday, January 03, 2005

A Brand New Brand

Meet the New Coke, same as the Old Coke. Whatever happens, if the Angels start losing, all the name changes in the world won't help you, Arte. There's still a mess of questions left: Why do we have three first basemen (Erstad, Kotchman, and Morales)? Why did we let Jenks go to the Rule 5 draft? Why did the team fail to get even one quality pitcher in the offseason? Why haven't the Angels signed Jered Weaver? Does Stoneman really think rookie Dallas McPherson's going to hold his own against real major league pitching? Too many questions, not enough answers. This is the silliest name change ever, and for a reason that isn't going to make a difference.

Just win. That is all.

Update: Good stuff at Pearly Gates on this one. Arte breaks the virtuous cycle at his own peril, it seems...

Update 2: Look, for all the people who think "Los Angeles Angels" is silly because it translates in Spanish to "the Angels Angels", well, I would remind you that this was in fact the name of the team when the franchise was first formed. It was named for the most successful of the old PCL teams in Los Angeles (the other two being the Hollywood Stars and the Vernon Tigers). Now, if you're going to argue the name's a chicken cop-out designed to evade a lawsuit, well, I suspect you'd be right -- and according to both the Times and the Associated Press, the city of Anaheim intends to sue anyway, so if that was the point, it's not a very usable one. Work up some nerve, Arte. Drop the "Anaheim", if you must, but show some courage if you intend to weasel out of your agreements. And, finally -- once more -- win. If you lose, they'll call you mud, regardless of the name on the uniforms.


Comments:
This could just be the Angel hater in me talking, but this is how I see it:

(Rally Monkey + ThunderStix)/Productive Outs x Name Change = Laughing Stock of the League
 
Hey hon, the offseason ain't over yet, y'know. :-) There's still time. Whether or not the Angels will take advantage of it is anyone's guess, but you're burying something alive here...
 
I'm not saying they will lose, but I am saying that they've made negative moves in the rotation and bullpen that amount to 2-5 wins worse, and questionable moves on offense. Morales and McPherson have to pan out for all this to work, and so does Finley. I'm less worried about Fins than some people, but so far, Stoneman doesn't seem to have much of a plan. And knowing him, there may not be one.
 
I have to agree with Joe....the Angels were already walking a fine line with the ThunderStix and Rally Monkey, not to mention a fanbase that sometimes seems like it doesn't know what's going on. Adding the "Los Angeles ____s of Anaheim" to the mix is definitely not going to help all that.

But in the end, Rob nails it on the head--no one's going to care about their name, their monkey, or their inflatable noisemakers if they go out and win the AL Pennant.

Side note--do they still call it the Pennant?
 
I can't help but chuckle at the name, especially given the fact that "Los Angeles" means "the Angels."

So the name of the team, translated, is now The The Angels Angels of Anaheim.

So how do you market this in Spanish, anyway? Presumably Los Los Angeles Angeles de Anaheim doesn't work. Los Angeles de Los Angeles de Anaheim sounds like a stutter, or possibly a bad joke.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2