<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Tuesday, August 16, 2005

No Excuses, Mike: Blue Jays 4, Angels 3

No damn excuses. Not only did the Angels waste a brilliant outing by Joe Saunders, but the loss was preventable. After Frankie walked in the tying run, out he goes. Or should have gone.

That game was absolute crap.

Update: Okay, things to take away from this:

ESPN Box (when they finally decide to publish one) • Recap


Comments:
"That game was absolute crap."
--

Couldn't have said it better myself. The positives were the great outing by Saunders and the surprisingly effective work by Gregg.

But right now this doesn't look like a team that will make it past the first round of the playoffs, assuming they even make the playoffs. Generally it's a good idea to have a closer who can find the strike zone.

And Finley, as usual, did a fine Scott Spiezo impression.

What shit.

- Chris
 
Yeah I agree Finley should've been pinch hit and I think Escobar should be getting serious consideration for the closer role.

Finley should be relegated to the bench warmer role. Granted, $7 million a year makes for one hell of an expensive bench warmer but so be it. Signing him was perhaps an honest mistake on Stoneman's part given Finley' stellar year last year. I think what happened it that he went super nova and no longer has anything left to offer at the plate.

- Chris
 
As long as Cabrera gets a hit a game and can bunt, I like him better in the 2 spot than down in the lineup. We have too many outs coming from the 6 to 8 spots (DaVanon, J. Molina, Finley, and often Rivera). At least, his spirits are up in the two spot.

One of the guys at Fanstop said ABC News reports that the Angels are on the verge of a big deal. I'm awaiting an answer on where he heard this (radio, online, TV). With the uncertainty with GA, we definitely need another bat.
 
Christ, don't let it be Mike Sweeney. Talk about the second coming of Anderson!
 
Who does Adam Kennedy have to sleep with to hit #2?
 
I'm hoping it is Sweeney. He heard it on channel 7 news.
 
Do you really think the team should have Kennedy #2 and Erstad #3? Scioscia said that Kennedy hits too well to be a pure situational hitter.
 
Scioscia said that Kennedy hits too well to be a pure situational hitter.


What the hell does that mean?
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2