<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Saturday, September 10, 2005

Getting Your Money's Worth: Angels 6, White Sox 5

As crazy tight as this race has been, the Angels sure didn't miss any tricks today. It wasn't anybody's best game, but this one felt like a playoff game, probably because if the Angels do make it to the postseason, there's a good chance they'll see the Chisox.

Neither Buhrle nor Washburn had their best stuff, and so the score ended up tied into extra innings. Even Bobby Jenks had to make a turn -- three scoreless innings worth -- against the Angels, blanking his old club; Garret Anderson couldn't turn on his fastball, which leads me to believe there's even worse, if you can believe it, coming ahead. The Angels will need an outfielder or three with some pop, not to mention a fully functional Dallas McPherson.

In the end, the game came down to three crucial plays:

Of course, you could also credit Robb Quinlan with his solo homer, or any of the other four scoring plays, but such is the psychology of victory that these things recede to the background. Bottom line, I fully expected the Angels to lose tonight, and that they pulled a win together was extra sweet, especially since the A's beat Texas 9-8. The Angels get to keep their by-their-whiskers division lead for another day.

ESPN BoxRecap


Comments:
Going to school in Northwest Indiana, me and a buddy were able to make the trip to Chicago. Let me tell you that it was quite possibly the best baseball game that i've been to. At times it was painful to watch and I thought the Angels would lose but somehow they kept getting though jams. I will say that Stoneman made a big mistake in letting Jenks go. He pitched an impressive 3 innings. The Vlad play at home was certainly a gutsy move and it looked as though he would be tagged out. Overall it was great game and hopefully they can gain momentum from the win
 
Is it just me, or did it look like Vlad should have been called out for being off the basepath? I thought it was an insanely crazy thing to even try, and he only got away with it because he was so far off the line that AJ couldn't stretch to reach him.

Granted, what I saw was the MLB.com highlight video clip on the web, which didn't show him until he was halfway between third and home, so...
 
Hi, Blue! Yeah, I thought that, too. I was surprised they didn't. Ballsy baserunning, though.
 
Ballsy? I was thinking more along the lines of... well, stupid. Stupid becomes ballsy if it works, but it's just another way of saying the same thing.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2