<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Thursday, September 01, 2005

Today Is Brought To You By The Letter Q And The Number 54: Angels 3, A's 0

So Frankie didn't implode for two whole games. It's a streak or somethin', I tells ya, and Sean, you can get that goddamned enchanted Tiki Room musical out of your head now. Not only does Matt get props for accurately predicting the situation as of 9:34 PDT today, but you can ask some of the more classless twerps at Athletics Nation about how much offense Vlad contributed in this series (two whole RBIs!) and how much guys like Quinlan (two home runs!) did. Jebus Christ, you'd think the Angels consisted of Vlad and Vlad alone reading some of these yutzes. Criminey.

Anyway, with Magic on the mound at home and at night (is he a vampire or something?), everything was in his favor about as much as it could be. The kid just dealt his way through the game, and when he got in trouble, managed to pull a GIDP out'n his hat to get out of the only real jam he got into, with men on the corners in the eighth.

So, we're back to the ol' knife fight to the death again, with the Angels facing a relatively light schedule, and the hobbled A's -- minus Crosby, Rich Harden (again, thank God we missed him), and Mark Kotsay -- slide into September. And did I mention the Angels are getting Escobar back this week? No?

Heh.

Update 9/2: And with the win, Scioscia accrues his 500th career win. He remains second on the Angels all-time managerial win list; only Bill Rigney with 625 has more, meaning Mike should probably surpass him in 2007. Congratulations, Mike!

ESPN BoxRecap


Comments:
That comment about the Angels paying $30 million for "one win" is so hilariously stupid. Following that logic, the A's paid $67 million to stay home and watch the playoffs on TV.
 
Sounds like they don't quite have a grasp on the word "fraud", but the comment that the Angels don't spend wisely is undeniable, isn't it? $90m payroll, and a third of it goes to Erstad/Cabrera/Finley/Salmon. I've got no problem with them saying it.
 
There's no question that Stoneman has made bad moves; I spend a lot of space here decrying the more obvious waste. Finley, Cabrera, Erstad, are all bad contracts, and to some degree, Anderson's is as well. I can't agree about Salmon, though; his contract was in the context of silly long-term deals.

I guess what I object to is the usual annoying tone so many of the A's fans adopt that make it sound like Beane never makes a mistake. Hello, Mike Magnante? Jermaine Dye? Hell, Jason Kendall?
 
Steve -- in case you were joking, Vlad's offensive output for the Oakland series consisted of a run scored, a double, two singles, and no walks. He was outhomered by Robb Quinlan and outhit by Garret Anderson and Chone Figgins, the latter despite having two 0-fer games at the plate in the first two. The Angels' offense is no more all Vlad than the A's is all Chavez.
 
Oops, I shouldn't have said Figgins outhit Vlad. But he did tie him.
 
Yeah, that's for sure. There's some saber- (SABR-?) rattling that this Daric Barton kid could be something special when he comes up, probably next year knowing Billy, and sayonara Hatteberg.

I dunno who would be raspberrying Santana. Do sound the klaxon when Weaver has four games against any four NL contenders as dominant as the ones Santana has had against Boston, Chicago, New York, and Oakland. The kid melts against the Indians and Devil Rays? I'll take that any day for a good chance to shut down the big boys.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2