<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Wednesday, October 05, 2005

Bunt-A, Bunt-A, Bunt-A, Bunt Me: Angels 5, Yankees 3

Well, that was pleasant.

Not.

Watching the top of the order go 1-15 (the same four characters are an astounding 3-30 in the series) makes me wonder how the Angels ended up with 95 wins at all. And yet, it happened, and even the sabermetric guys note that the Angels have performed exactly to their Pythagorean record, while the Yanks are five games over theirs.

The one thing that really bugs me about all the guys predicting the Angels to advance is that they won at least two of their games against the Yanks in the regular season against pitchers they won't see as starters: Kevin Brown and Al Leiter. The good news, such as it is, is that tonight they won against 8-5 Chien-Ming Wang, the one guy in the Yankees rotation that they haven't seen before. Since it's pretty much a certainty that they'll see Randy Johnson now, let's hope they get to do so on a cold day and his back kinks up. Johnson's April and May were simply un-Johnsonlike; weather for this week, however, looks cool but not cold. Oh well.

Anyway, back to tonight's game. In the seventh -- that wacky inning that must have had Jim Tracy smirking behind his TV set -- Rivera reached on a sliding infield single. Finley tried to get down a bunt -- failed -- yet got aboard on a lousy throw from Wang. Kennedy bunted the runners over, and somehow, after Figgins flied out, Cabrera magically got only his second hit of the series, plating both Finley and DaVanon (Rivera seems to have hurt himself sliding in). All of which is to say that first, O-Cab came up big when he needed to, and second, the Yankees still have lousy infield defense, neither run being earned.

Lackey wasn't too steady, and got bounced in the sixth; fortunately, the Halos have a far deeper bullpen now that they've got Escobar in the mix, and it turned out not to matter.

ESPN BoxRecap


Comments:
Finley tried to get down a bunt -- failed

Wha-huh? How did he fail? He bunted it to the pitcher, and it would have been a normal sacrifice if not for the bad throw. It looked to me like he successfully got the bunt down.
 
now that's a scrappy inning.
 
From where we were it appeared he popped it.
 
Adam,

Defense is overrated.

Sincerely,

Paul Depodesta
 
The striking thing about him is that no matter which position he plays he's probably the best Angel at that position. That is truly valuable.

I'm not sure that's true at second base -- I do believe (just from memory) that Kennedy's a superior second baseman -- but it's absolutely true in center and at third.
 
Seitz is right - Finley put down a servicable sacrifice. Fortunately, it died unexpectedly in the grass, and Wang had to take an extra step or two to field it, forcing him to rush the throw (and throw from a slightly more acute angle than he was expecting).
 
<< Wang had to take an extra step or two to field it, forcing him to rush the throw (and throw from a slightly more acute angle than he was expecting >>

I think he was throwing across his body to get him out. Obviously a tough throw for a rightie.

How worried should we be with Vlad's lack of production? The Angels can't possibly survive at Yankees stadium without him hitting well.
 
How worried should we be with Vlad's lack of production?

Good question. The problem I have is that it's been the bottom of the order carrying this team for a while now.
 
Vlad's lack of production = (cue Mick Jagger) TI-I-I-IME ... IS ON MY SIDE, yes it is...
 
If the Yankees keep shutting down Vlad, you have to like their chances in 4. Even if their pitching collapses or even if the Angels bottom order keeps making freak hits/runs, the Angels will lose in 4.

I'm also nervous about Byrd facing the Yankees. Unless the umpire is calling a generous strike zone, I think he's going to get shelled.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2