<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Saturday, December 03, 2005

Pickoff Moves

A's Interested In Bradley, Other A's News

Ramirez Non-News

In the Providence Journal, the four-headed monster that is the current Red Sox front office tells tales:
"Teams have expressed a lot of interest in Manny," confirmed Hoyer, "but he's still one of the top 3-4 hitters in baseball. We'er going to keep on listening. But as evidenced by the fact that we haven't made a deal, no one has stepped up and (met) the price we want for him.

"We're going to keep listening, and if something worked out that we felt would benefit the club short- and long-term, we would act. We're certainly not going in with the expectation that we're going to make a trade. Someone would really have to step up and meet our expectations."

It's a complicated situation; they could certainly hold on to him, as the team's under no obligation to honor his request, a circumstance that applied when the Dodgers had a disgruntled Gary Sheffield in 2001. Since he has 10/5 protection, he can veto any trade.

Twins Trade For Castilla

The Marlins sent second baseman Luis Castilla to the Twins in exchange for a pair of pitchers, Travis Bowyer and Scott Tyler.

Comments:
It was also mentioned the other day -- perhaps in one of Rosenthal's columns; I don't remember -- that Manny would be seeking some kind of contract extension as well, which could further complicate a trade.
 
I have also heard (see comment 290 in this Dodger Thoughts thread) and been unable to confirm that NESN reported Manny would be willing to take a pay cut if it accellerated his departure from Boston. Such talk is bunk, of course, as the players' union would never allow such a thing.
 
Rob, Manny could restructure his contract. For instance look at the New York Mets and bobby Bonilla. If say the Angels get Ramirez, Manny could then allow the Angels to delay $20 million of his contract. Essentially, the Angels would pay him $1 mill a year for 20 years. The thing is the discount rate, as a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in 10 years. If the future discount rate is 1%, that would be a considerable savings for the Angels or whatever team picked up Ramirez. Discount rates on most financial instruments are significantly higher.
 
A restructured deal isn't the same thing as a pay cut, though.
 
If the deal was restructured to delay payment where the Angels delayed $20 million in salary, and paid Ramirez a million dollars every year starting in 2015 Arte would save (using a conservative 5% future discount rate) nearly $12 million dollars.

A restructured deal can be the same as a salary cut, as the foremost example illustrates. A dollar today is not worth in ten years. Ramirez at 3/46 is a lot more enticing.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2