<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Roster Notes


Comments:
If Glaus is willing to play first base, why not just cut out Boston and send some prospects to the Rattlers for Glaus?

Better yet, let's go back in time and sign Glaus as a free agent last year to play first base. Then the Angels might have two WS trophies to admire.
 
No way do the Angels win it all last year. With the top four hitters slumping, Glaus couldn't have carried the team on his (fragile) shoulders.
 
Of course, we'll never know with certainty, but I'm a big believer in 'tipping points.' I think one additional bat could have made the difference because Glaus' at-bats would have effected other players' at-bats. Sabremetric guys hate that kind of talk because it's so hard to measure, but physics is full of transition points that dramatically alter the state of a system.
 
If Bengie did come back for a season, would the Angels even consider a big bopper? I mean, Bengie will probably get about $8 million in arbitration and he would give the team essentially equal or better production at every position than last season. That would translate into an offense roughly similar to 2004 assuming no one gets hurt or performs like Finley did last year over 400 PAs.
 
If you're Bengie, though, isn't that a terrible deal? You've already been jilted once by the big, identifiable teams with big checkbooks and a history of dumb overspending (read: the Mets so far), and it's an open secret that you can't run, your behind-the-plate skills are on the wane, and your durability is suspect. On top of all that, the Angels give you a one-year deal that delays your Big, Stinking, Make Me Rich contract by another year, another year in which you can only get older. If you're Bengie Molina, it's all downside..
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2