<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Thursday, December 08, 2005

Roster Notes


Comments:
The L.A. Times is reporting that the Angels have kicked around the idea of trading Erstad for Baltimore's Javey Lopez. They've also discussed acquiring the Twin's J.C. Romero, a lefthanded relief pitcher.
 
Yes, Mike DiGiovanna's LA Times update was interesting. The more i think about it, the more Nomar makes sense for us. I'm still not sold that D-Mac is the answer at 3B, so Nomar would be a good option there as well as DH. He also has that interchangability factor the Halos really like and utilize, that Frank Thomas and Piazza don't. And he's a local guy too, coming home.
 
My theory is D-Mac has three months to prove he's an answer at third. After that, he's tradebait or who knows what.
 
Seriously, why would Boston even bother asking for a combination that includes two of Wood, Kendrick & Aybar, PLUS another prospect, PLUS a pitcher, unless they're planning to send David Ortiz along with Manny?

My money is on Ramirez staying in Boston. I don't think that there's any team foolish enough to satisfy Boston's demands.
 
Jayson Stark of ESPN.com just posted an article discounting the possibility of Manny being traded.
 
Matthew -- ditto.
 
boneyard -- I think you meant Gammons, who wrote

6. Will Manny Ramirez get traded?

Not now. His personal problems are his responsibility, not those of the team. The Angels will not give up value, and neither can the Mets. The three-way with the Dodgers and Phillies (Ramirez to L.A.; Derek Lowe, Trot Nixon and a prospect to Philly; Bobby Abreu, J.D. Drew and a prospect to Boston) fell apart quickly. For $160 million, it is Ramirez's job to accept some adult responsibility. He can ask to be traded, but he has no right to demand one. He can sit at home and forfeit $57 million, or he can forfeit the last three years and pay $40 million in damages to be a free agent.

 
The Erstad-for-Lopez deal makes absolute sense for the Angels, does it not?
 
But of course.
 
So it probably won't go thru then...

;-)
 
See Jayson Stark's Dec 8th column summing up the winter meetings. He comments on Manny, too.
 
If we are even thinking about 2 of our 3 best prospects (who I hope to see in a Halos uniform when I visit in 2007) for Manny, who is undoubtedly a good hitter but brings the possibility of clubhouse unrest, then the senior management needs their heads examining. Cabrera to the Sox and Miguel Tejada to us might be interesting though.
 
Matt -- interesting if you want to guarantee Brandon Wood will be blocked at short.
 
If we were to acquire Miggie, we could move Wood to another position, assuming Wood even makes it to the show. There's been alot of talk that Wood doesn't have the range to be a top-flight major league shortstop and/or that he will "out grow" the position. He could replace D-Mac at third, perhaps, or become a Jeff Kent type bopper at second, or an outfielder.
 
I see John Sickels has a column posted at Rotowire -- subscription only, alas -- entitled "Up the Middle in Anaheim." Has anyone read the column and if so is there anything interesting in it?
 
Anon -- I think that talk isn't justified based on most of the stuff I've read recently. He's got decent, not great, range. And the comment about Wood not making it to the majors is well-taken; they are called prospects after all, and guys who strike out as much as Wood does will have to be watched closely.
 
The Erstad deal makes no sense to me. Lopez will come in and take at bats away from Rivera, who is cheaper, and just as good if not better. Let's see, a 34 year old who has all that wear and tear from catching his entire career, or a 28 year old who has shown ability to play every day, and who can play on days when GA needs to DH.

The deal only makes sense if the Angels are determined to play Erstad at first base or trade him. It only makes sense if they continue the stupidity of not playing Erstad in center. Deals necessitated by their own stupidity don't excite me all that much.
 
I think the Angels are going to move Darin back to centerfield -- provided they don't trade him. A second newspaper, this time the O.C. Register, touched on the likelihood of his moving back to center to make room for Casey Kotchman. So things are looking up.
 
If the Angels keep Erstad and move him to center, what will they do with Finley?

Please note: I did not ask what SHOULD they do with Finley. That's too obvious. What WILL they do with him?
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2