<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

The Crank Uses EWSR To Predict The AL West

In line with the Rev's Month of Predictionary blogging, let me introduce you to the Baseball Crank's AL West predictions, based on Established Win Share Levels. But before I get to his 2006 predictions, let's take a brief look at his track record with the AL West. Last year, he correctly spotted the Angels as division winners, and of the A's, he wrote
My gut tells me the A's will be a force to be reckoned with this season. But EWSL is much more sober about the rebuilding job the team needs to suffer through before the A's can be considered a bankable contender rather than a maybe-if-everything-breaks-right longshot. Do the math and you'll see that the bulk of the problem is that Oakland has handed over 3/5 of the starting rotation to guys with no major league track record of success.
Indeed, that huge injection of youth was the dealbreaker for the A's, who struggled in the early going. In the interests of fairness, his first pass at this -- in 2004 -- showed the weakness of his methodology, by picking a very old Mariners team to win the division, followed by the Angels. Of course, he admitted immediately that the M's were begging for trouble with their roster full o' grandpas, and sure enough, the M's finished last with a 63-93 record.

This year, the Crank has the division going down in about the same order I did over at the Analysts (A's-Angels-Rangers-Mariners), but what surprised me is just how close the race really is at the top. Even the Crank isn't entirely sold on the idea that the A's will hoist the division pennant in their park come October:

I'm not sure I see Oakland beating the Angels this year, but this is definitely a team that will make the race neck-and-neck, at least. Much will depend on the health of Milton Bradley and Frank Thomas and the sophomore progress of Haren, Blanton, Street, Nick Swisher and Dan Johnson.
I completely agree. What I see as difference makers for both the A's and Angels:

Comments:
So, you think that the Angels' hitting depth is a negative? The way I see it, Erstad's and GA's injuries will be resolved in a matter of weeks, Salmon can be useful playing just a few times a week while he gets into shape, and Morales can learn stuff at AAA. I know you can be more pessimistic that I am, but when has depth ever been a negative?
 
Maybe I misexpressed that. The real problem is that the Angels have too many DH's and not enough corner outfielders. If you look at the Angels depth chart, you see Juan Rivera penciled in to all three outfield positions, with only the regular starters ahead of him. That's a problem if, as I expect, more than one of the trio goes down for an extended period of time.
 
Crank -- take a look at the M's bullpen ERA; you'll be surprised to find they're only a couple points behind the Angels.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2