<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Not Reading The Paper

Frank Mickadeit has a discovery about why Arte Moreno decided to rename the Anaheim Angels to, well, that other name:
As McDonald explains, "The business model for all major stick-and-ball sports ... is predicated on DMA."

That's short for Designated Market Area, a list used by the TV and ad industries to rank all 210 media markets in the U.S. It's based on the number of homes with televisions. No. 1 is New York and No. 210 is Glendive, Mont. (motto: "Good People Surrounded by Badlands") - which has 5,020 homes with TVs. Insert your own sheep joke here.

A sports team lives and dies, financially, on "its ability to drive revenue across every part" of its DMA. The "Los Angeles" DMA, No. 2 in the U.S., covers the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, Ventura, San Bernardino and Riverside, except Palm Springs.

The best strategy to target all areas of a DMA, McDonald says, is to adopt the popular DMA name as the geographic part of the team's name. That allows a cable network like Fox Sports Net to sell to all areas of the market.

"It is absolutely no coincidence that clubs branded 'Anaheim,' 'California,' 'San Jose,' 'Golden State' and 'Oakland' have problems finding media dollars, as none of those ... reflect the DMA the team plays in."

"While Cox (Cable) in Rancho Santa Margarita may sell 'Anaheim' with ease, Adelphia in Los Angeles ... can't go to the Thousand Oaks Auto Mall and ask them to attach their brand to 'Anaheim.'"

"It is no coincidence that the Angels rebrand with ... ('Los Angeles') and nine months later, Fox Sports offers them a (TV) contract that triples their media revenue. ... The Angels significantly increased the number of advertising targets Fox can approach."

And what if Orange County became its own DMA?

It would be No. 30, behind markets such as Raleigh-Durham. Rules would keep Angels and Ducks broadcasts out of the L.A. DMA, so "advertising revenue would plummet, and both O.C. franchises would eventually relocate."

I would point out that a No. 30 DMA would still put us ahead of a lot of other pro sports towns - Kansas City, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, New Orleans and Memphis - so I don't subscribe to McDonald's dire prediction, but I do appreciate his work here.

Or, he could have just read his own paper back in January of last year, when Arte Moreno said basically the same thing. It really is true: reading is fundamental!

Comments:
I would point out that a No. 30 DMA would still put us ahead of a lot of other pro sports towns - Kansas City, Milwaukee, Cincinnati, Salt Lake City, San Antonio, New Orleans and Memphis - so I don't subscribe to McDonald's dire prediction
-Frank Mickadeit

Someone needs to remind Mr. Mickadeit that those other smaller cities nevertheless have their own television stations. While OC might be #30, it would be academic. He acknowledges that the games couldn't be broadcast in L.A., while failing to realize that there would be no broadcast alternative for the Halos.

Talk about a sore loser.
 
This whole US that he refers to ("would still put US...") - other than zipcode, there is NOTHING distinct and regional about people in Orange County (and specifically Anaheim) that separates them from people in Los Angeles. Nada - same radio, same teevee, same weather, feel an earthquake here, feel it there. Same cultural experiential esixtences.
 
That's not entirely true, Rev. Orange County is distinct from LA both politically and culturally. I mean, one thing OC was famous for way back when was being extremely conservative. Culturally, it may not be quite as distinct as it is politically, but there is a divide.
 
The problem with Mickadeit's article is that he failed to read the rival paper, the L.A. Times, which quoted the guy at Fox Sports saying the name change had zero to do with the new TV deal. It was the team winning on the field that made it attractice.
 
... but still a jerk.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2