<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Friday, May 19, 2006

Pickoff Moves

Today's Birthdays

Bill Antonello BRO b. 1927, played 1953, d. 1993-03-04

Dan Ford CAL b. 1952, played 1979-1981. Even though I was only dimly aware of the Angels' existence as a youth, I remember Dan Ford for some reason. A top 100 Angel, he's proof that you don't need to be a Reggie Jackson to have a major league career. Never great, he managed at least to have his best season with the Angels. In a sense, it was only fitting: the Halos brought him in to replace a real star, and ironically, another Twin, Lyman Bostock.

Jim Hickman BRO b. 1892, played 1916-1919, d. 1958-12-30

Mike Lee LAA b. 1941, played 1963

Phil Leftwich CAL b. 1969, played 1993-1994, 1996

Earl Naylor BRO b. 1919, played 1946, d. 1990-01-16

Josh Paul ANA,LAA b. 1975, played 2004-2005. Loudmouth White Sox fans will never understand that Doug Eddings blew the call. It's called a gift. Your team won, already. Stop being jerks about it.

Dutch Schliebner BRO b. 1891, played 1923, d. 1975-04-15

Curt Simmons CAL b. 1929, played 1967, All-Star: 1952,1953,1957. Even though he was in the twilight of his career, he was a great pitcher for the Angels for the last 34.2 innings he had. A number two starter for the NL-winning 1950 "Whiz Kids" Phillies, he got one of the largest bonuses for a teenager to that point when the Phils paid him $65,000 in 1947. After the Phils released him in 1960 following arm trouble, he reinvented himself as a soft-tossing breaking ball specialist. He signed with the Cards, with whom he spent another six years.

Roster Notes


Comments:
Well, the idea behind RISP is not that you score more runs than the OBP teams like the Red Sox and Yankees, but that you score more runs than you would normally score based on stats like OBP. By that measure, I would say that the 2005 Angels offense worked well in that regard: if I recall correctly, they had the highest RISP batting average, which should add enough runs to what they would have had.
 
right, but the critics of a RISP approach might contend that it's not a repeatable skill to be able to hit better with RISP. if you could hit better with RISP, why wouldn't you hit better all the time?
 
The critics of the productive out point out that nobody's ever been able to show it correlates whatsoever to runs scored.

I recall that someone over at BTB recently claimed to have discovered the unicorn's chimera, the clutch hitter, but once more the data had to be sliced so thinly that you may as well give up hope finding nine such stalwarts to make a starting lineup.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2