<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Monday, May 29, 2006

Pickoff Moves

Today's Birthdays

Toby Borland ANA b. 1969, played 2001

Eric Davis LAN b. 1962, played 1992-1993, All-Star: 1987, 1989. Everybody remembers what a bust Daryl Strawberry was, but Eric Davis was just as big a disappointment. Blazingly fast and gifted with a phenominal power bat, the Dodgers thought they were getting a 1-2 punch with Davis in center and Strawberry in right when they traded for Davis from the Reds in November, 1991. Davis, who had been Strawberry's childhood friend, instead broke his left wrist, sprained his left shoulder and herniated a disc in his neck during the wretched 1992 season, appearing in only 76 games. The Dodgers traded him to Detroit near the end of 1993; he retired in 1994 after the neck problems got too much for him. But the rest proved a tonic, and he came back with the Reds in 1996, rewarding Cincinnati with his best numbers in seven years (.287/.394/.523 with 26 homers). He signed the Orioles in 1997, but was diagnosed with colon cancer in May; he struggled through chemotherapy and returned to the lineup in September. He retired three years later after injury-plagued stints with the Cards and Giants.

Phil Gallivan BRO b. 1907, played 1931, d. 1969-11-24

John Kennedy LAN b. 1941, played 1965-1966. May 29 is also conveniently the other John Kennedy's birthday, but this one made a career out of not hitting but being a good late-innings replacement. Mike Napoli alert: he homered in his first appearance. Sometimes a first-at-bat-homer is a sign of nothing.

Dyar Miller CAL b. 1946, played 1977-1979. There must be some good reason why the 1979 Angels sold their third-best reliever to the Blue Jays. Right? It's the kind of head-scratching move the Angels front office made in those days; they won the division anyway but lost the ALCS to the heavily favored, 102-57 Orioles.

Trever Miller LAN b. 1973, played 2000

One Assessment Of Angels Player Development

Here's an interesting assessment of the Angels player development so far from John Klima in the Daily Breeze:
For years, the Angels have said that they sought to design their organization around the model of the Atlanta Braves. Any player development plan in baseball can best be called a five-year plan, but the Angels -- in terms of position players -- have not yet succeeded. This is not to say they won't eventually, but the early returns haven't been promising.

Dallas McPherson is a mistake hitter with a long swing and little discipline. Casey Kotchman, bothered by illness this season, hasn't yet shown that he can maintain a consistent hitting approach, teetering between the temptation to use the whole field one month and pulling everything in sight the next. Jeff Mathis is capable of catching-and-throwing at the elite level, but he didn't hit.

Pitching is a different story. The Angels covet tall, hard-throwing right-handers, but seem weary to place their faith in finesse left-handers who might get outs with offspeed pitches, leading to a lack of depth and differentiation, an imbalance that continually plagues their major league pitching staff.

The result is an assembly line, players whose individuality has been stripped for the sake of conformity. A stream of players with identically open stances, as taught in the minor leagues, weaned on aggressive hitting, which when trying to learn to recognize the difference between a triple-A and a big league slider, is difficult to maintain. It leads to hacking. Hacking leads to frustration. Frustration leads back to the Pacific Coast League.

It's a bit of an overgeneralization, but at the same time it's also true that the Angels' inability to make friends with Mr. Ball Four expresses itself at every level of the organization; it's not just Mickey Hacker Hatcher. I certainly expect to see Howie Kendrick back, but when we see the likes of the much-heralded Brandon Wood striking out in over a third of his double-A at bats, well... he's young, of course, but are the Angels really the right organization to break him of that habit?

Roster Notes


Comments:
Well, I think that any system that wants to become good has to become a sort of assembly line. There is a difference between drafting or signing solid talent that plays in the minors at most for 1-2 years (people like Jered Weaver and Albert Pujols), and developing talent that comes through the minors in 3-5 years. The Angels are building a farm system that can teach players to play Angel baseball. This is exactly like any other training program, such as college and vocational school. They teach you how to be successful in that field. The A's do this, as well, just with a different organizational philosophy.
 
As disapointed as I've been in the Angels' season thus far, I find criticism of the Angels' kids like this to be particularly uninformed.

As frustrating as it is, the fact of the matter is that many of the best players in the history of baseball have stunk it up in their first cup of coffee in the bigs. Players like Albert Pujuols are the exception. It's pure meshugana to draw any conclusions from a player's first handful of ABs.

Frankly, in Kotchman's run of regular play at the end of 2005, he seemed remarkably consistent. The dude is too sick to play right now. He's not taking batting practice or anything.

On another topic, any bio of Eric Davis that doesn't mention that he went off to the tune of .327/.388/.582 (best career BA & 2nd-best SLG) with 28 HR and 29 2B in 1998 after he came back from colon cancer does him a disservice.
 
I might agree with you, except that it doesn't strike me as an unfair characterization of the Angels' organizational hitting philosophy — i.e., they don't have one. McPherson has always been a little old for his leagues and a little injury-prone; his strikeouts have increased at every level. I certainly don't find Klima's comments factually wrong anywhere; was it not indeed the case that Kotchman had a tendency to pull everything once the regular season started? Maybe he did have mono (and if so, aren't his criticisms of the team's medical care just a little ridiculous considering his sprint training numbers?), but unless that factored in to his pulling the ball somehow, I'm not sure how Klima's assessment — which even includes a well-considered caveat about small sample sizes — amounts to meshugana.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2