<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Friday, May 18, 2007

The Clinker: Pierre vs. Matthews, Jr. Redux

I missed this Bill Shaikin piece in the Times contrasting Juan Pierre with Gary Matthews, Jr.:
"You can't go wrong with either one," Figgins said.

That opinion was far from unanimous during the winter, after Matthews and Pierre each signed a five-year deal to play in the Southland.

The Angels paid $50 million for Matthews, and the critics howled: way too much for a guy coming off a career year! The Dodgers paid $44 million for Pierre, and the critics howled again: way too much for a singles hitter with a spotty on-base percentage!

Yet, if you base the early returns on the standings, the investments are paying off. The Angels are in first place with Matthews, the Dodgers are in first place with Pierre, and isn't that the point?

"To some people," Pierre said.

The Angels are getting all of what they wanted from Matthews, the Dodgers most of what they wanted from Pierre.

Quoting Jon (see comment 40):
The Dodgers are in first place with me as a fan and my kids waking up feisty and the skies being hazy this morning. There's stuff that's relevant, and stuff that's irrelevant. Pierre is not relevant to the Dodgers being in first place this year, and part of the reason the Pierre harangues never shut down is because this is what they come up against.

In 190 plate appearances, Pierre's TB + BB + HBP + SB - CS are 72. That is an objective negative. You can touch it up with sacrifices or running from first to third if you want or his general good-guyness, but I'm pretty convinced there are other good guys that can do better. His EQA is .240. It's just not good. An article like this only serves to rejuvenate the anti-Pierre campaign.

I've never felt that Pierre would make or break the Dodgers this year, but to credit him for being in first place, or for him to say people are picking on him unfairly - I just can't get on board. The criticisms may be all too frequent, but they're not off target.

Exactly. Pierre currently owns a -0.6 VORP score, meaning he's about as valuable as ... Alfredo Amezega. Meantime, Gary Matthews, Jr. is tied for fourth-most valuable centerfielder, with Ichiro Suzuki, both having 12.9 VORP. Factor in defense (GMJ has a 103 Rate2, slightly above average, while Pierre is slightly below average at 96 Rate2), and this one isn't even close. While I do expect the two players to converge a bit over time, Pierre's failings haven't improved; and so far, Matthews, Jr. has managed to make his 2006 look like it might just be repeatable.

Update: There is one thing that I had forgotten about, a justification the Angels have used for using Chone Figgins as a leadoff man: he scores a lot of runs. Just so, Pierre is currently tied for second in the league for runs scored by a centerfielder, only one behind Aaron Rowand of the Phillies and tied with Carlos Beltran of the Mets at 26. (You may notice that he isn't, however, first on the team in this category; Russ Martin beats him with 27.) Bill James said that scoring runs was an underrated ability, and so maybe there lies some means of recovering a bit of value; but with GMJ having scored 28, it's still tough to sell that Pierre = Matthews.

Labels: , , ,


Comments:
One thing to note, as well, is that Pierre actually signed first (contrary to what the article says). That means his contract set the market for Matthews. Have both players been good? Sure, I won't argue they haven't been. Has Pierre played worthy of making $9 million in a season...well, that's debatable. Has Matthews played worthy of making $10 million in a season? I would say that so far he has.
 
"Have both players been good? Sure, I won't argue they haven't been"

A negative VORP should basically mean that no one should have to argue about weather or not Pierre has been good.

Yet the LA times still tries .....
 
i heard somebody on ESPN Radio who's name was Rob & was an Angels fan but a die hard Dodger fan i quickly thought could it be Scareduck/Rob? Well, was it you??
 
schoffle, I honestly don't know how Pierre has done other than the stats (maybe he has hit well in the clutch or been somehow instrumental as a sparkplug) and so what I really meant is that I have no reason to argue either way about Pierre. His stats don't strike me as particularly bad (like Shea) or particularly good (like Vlad) and the fact is that he is scoring runs, stealing bases, and the team is winning. And if he continues to score runs and steal bases AND the team continues to win, I would consider him a success in that the Dodgers got what they wanted from him. It's irrelevant to say he doesn't hit for power when the Dodgers signed him, they had no intention of getting more power out of him.
 
Bluebleeder -- no, wasn't me. I generally don't call sports talk radio, though I did a couple of times three years ago.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2