<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Thursday, August 02, 2007

Pickoff Moves

Bill Plaschke May Be Teachable

I saw Times blowhard Bill Plaschke and Jay Mariotti of the Chicago Sun-Times on some awful TV program, and thought to myself, why, it's a race to the bottom. These are, quite possibly, America's two worst sports columnists. Imagine my shock, then, to read this piece in which he recants his usual trade-'em-now-trade-'em-all "philosophy" that has eroded the Dodgers for eons. He rolls over and admits his incessant cries in the past were nothing but gas:
Chances are, if you are desperate enough to trade top prospects for one big name, you are not good enough to win with him.

...

Today's titles are not won by instant roster changes, they are won by slow organizational upheavals, restocking and reworking and resisting every impulse to scream.

For the first time in a decade, they are no longer the kind of team that needs to do calisthenics every July to be strong for many Octobers.

They have a nucleus. They have a surplus. They have a clue.

What they may not eventually have this season is a spot in the playoffs, but -- and I can't believe I'm writing this -- maybe that can wait.

Maybe they have to sacrifice a September for James Loney, Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier to learn how to play in the heat.

Maybe they have to lose a division for Jonathon Broxton to learn how to pitch under the glare.

Not that I'm changing my mind about the quality of Plaschke's work, mind you; that he could be wrong for so incredibly long points out his uselessness. It's more an example of the stopped clock or the blind squirrel, with the door left open for more.

Roster Notes

Labels: , , , ,


Comments:
I read the first few sentences/paragraphs (same thing when it comes to Plaschke) and gave up. There's never been a bandwagon that hack wouldn't ride. I was trying to decide whether to give him credit for realizing the obvious.

Of course, his next original thought will be his first. Ultimately, I concluded that the reason he changed his tune is because he likes Ned Colletti. So, if Ned Coletti doesn't make a trade, then trades are bad. If Colletti makes a trade, then trades are good.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2