<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Sunday, October 14, 2007

ALCS Game 2, The Lesson Learned: Indians 13, Boston 6 (11 Innings)

The key to this game, of course, was Cleveland booting starter Curt Schilling early, eventually opening the door to the unsavory part of the Red Sox bullpen, though it took a while to get there. What they're doing sending Eric Gagne in with the game on the line in extras is beyond me, and at that point it was pretty clear that Terry Francona was just hoping he wouldn't have to use a starter.

I was thinking about the tally of events in that fateful 11th inning, and of scoring events, there were two singles, a wild pitch, a double, and a home run. Those latter two events got me to thinking about the Angels' predicament with regards to hitting the ball hard. Now, public rumormongering about A-Rod becoming an Angel is almost certainly a press release from the Devil himself, but let's put that aside for the moment. I was going to suggest that A-Rod's addition to the lineup would fail to give the team the kind of pop it needs in terms of aggregate team SLG, but that turned out to be wrong.

The Angels' team SLG was .417, good for 9th in the AL. Looking at the Angels' top two third basemen, Chone Figgins and Maicer Izturis playing in those positions, we get these numbers (A-Rod's presented for comparison):

Player      AB   H   2B  3B   HR
=================================
Figgins    424  125  23   5    3
Izturis    185   50   6   1    1
Rodriguez  583  183  31   0   54
Let's assume A-Rod absorbs 100% of Izturis' AB's at third, and the remaining fraction from Figgins. That leaves 239 of Figgins' AB's at third; assuming his rate stats remain the same, that means we see something like this (and giving Figgy credit for numbers rounded up):
Player      AB   H   2B  3B   HR
=================================
Figgins    239  79   13   3    2
Completely subtracting out Izturis and derating Figgins, we get these figures:
Player              AB    H    2B  3B   HR
==========================================
Team aggregate    5554  1578  324  23  123
Izturis actual    -185   -50   -6  -1   -1
Figgins actual    -424  -125  -23  -5   -3
Figgins derated    239    79   13   3    2
A-Rod 2007         583   183   31   0   54
                  ========================
         Totals   5554  1665  339  20  175
That alone brings the team aggregate SLG up to .462 (1665+339+2*20+3*175/5554), which would easily put the team in the top two or three by that metric.

Nevertheless, I find myself repelled by several things about A-Rod; he hasn't been a great postseason performer (though the usual small sample size issues pertain, amplified by the fact that typically players are facing much-better-than-average pitching at that time), he's a jerk (as exhibited by his exit from Seattle), and as Texas discovered, one A-Rod does not a team make. I worry about the payroll implications, mainly; does this mean the Angels would have a lot less money to spend in the draft and for international signing bonuses? Certainly.

Yahoo Box

Labels: , , , ,


Comments:
13-6 (11)
-RevHF
 
Corrected.
 
I think what you say about his recent postseason failures doesn't even really do that justice. Vlad's problems can, in part, be explained by the fact that he IS the offense and, therefore, teams don't pitch to him. A-Rod, meanwhile, has been a part of some of the best offenses in baseball in the last 4 years and STILL has basically stunk up the batter's box. If you add him to the current Angels squad, maybe you end up with a team with the best record in the majors (although, having Juan Rivera all year may have done that, since they needed just three wins), but does it really help the postseason? His presence might get Vlad some more pitches, but will A-Rod be any good directly? And then, if he is only helping out the regular season team, is he really worth $20-$30 million a year?

And note, this is besides the other baggage he brings that you also mentioned.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2