Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the
Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.
Sunday, August 08, 2004 |
Quote, Unquote
In the San Francisco Chronicle, regarding the nature of winning:
"I talked to Paul this morning," Beane said in a Friday interview, "and asked if he could acquire some chemistry from another GM whose team is out of the race. But I'm concerned chemistry might not clear waivers."
Comments:
Of course, with Beane's postseason success how could he be wrong on what it takes to build a champion?
Let's see... Dodgers leaving runners on base... check. Lo Duca getting clutch hits for the Fish... check. Know-it-all intellectuals still without a clue... check. So what else is new?
Hey Anon:
I wouldn't say that we're "know-it-all intellectuals still without a clue" (and not just because it's atrocious grammar). I mean, all those ‘know-it-alls without a clue’ have done is collect a 392-255 over the past four years with the Oakland A’s. I’d say they have a pretty good clue about how to win ballgames.
You seem very hostile towards those who don’t share your view of the baseball world. Perhaps you should calm down, take a deep breath, and then try to reason out some kind of counter argument other than “you’re stoopid!” People might take you more seriously that way.
I wouldn't say that we're "know-it-all intellectuals still without a clue" (and not just because it's atrocious grammar). I mean, all those ‘know-it-alls without a clue’ have done is collect a 392-255 over the past four years with the Oakland A’s. I’d say they have a pretty good clue about how to win ballgames.
You seem very hostile towards those who don’t share your view of the baseball world. Perhaps you should calm down, take a deep breath, and then try to reason out some kind of counter argument other than “you’re stoopid!” People might take you more seriously that way.
Newer› ‹Older
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.