<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Friday, February 04, 2005

Just Sosa: Dayn Perry Gets It Right

Moving a first-ballot Hall of Famer isn't like moving a piece of furniture; for one thing, the GM's probably pretty old and would throw out his back if he tried to do it himself, and besides, all his friends are busy this weekend. Jon's already covered the reaction from Goofysville and its suburbs, but when somebody gets the subsequent story right -- or at least, lands the dart close to the bullseye -- you have to give 'em mad props for the effort. Dayn Perry goes after Dusty Baker as the main reason for the Sosa trade, all the while slamming it as unnecessary despite Sosa's absorption of far too much payroll:
I'm aware that Sosa is overpaid, but that, of course, is the fault of the team for granting him an imprudent contract extension. I'm also aware that he was a petulant malcontent for much of last season, but that doesn't take away from the fact that he was a productive player in 2004. Sosa figures to be better in 2005 and will be difficult to replace.

As for Baker, he was derelict in his duties by not speaking to Sosa since Oct. 4 of last year. By no means is Sosa blameless in this flap, but it's Baker's job to extinguish mini-controversies of this nature, not allow them to fester.

Since last season, the Cub offense has lost 74 home runs (or 31.4 percent of their team total) with the departures of Sosa and Moises Alou. They still have power in the fold — it's not a stretch to imagine Aramis Ramirez, Derrek Lee and Corey Patterson combining to hit 100 homers — and if Nomar Garciaparra is able to defy recent history and cobble together a full season, that will of course help.

... You've probably heard it parroted in some circles that the Cubs had to, or needed to, get rid of Sosa to be able to position themselves for contention in 2005. Nonsense. What they needed was a manager who would do what he's paid to do — put out fires and maintain some semblance of esprit de corps. Baker has failed miserably on both counts. If the Cubs' efforts in 2005 come to grief, and they probably will, it's Baker who should be the first casualty.

It's rare to hear that a manager is the one pressing for a trade, and in this circumstance, Hendry should have told Dusty to calm down and deal for just one more year. Perry thinks the Cubs will have to be carried by the rotation, and he's right. However, the Cubs did exactly zero over the offseason to fix their problems in innings six through nine: And on it goes. The Cubs have arguably the best 1-5 rotation in baseball -- though that's getting a bit of a challenge with Greg Maddux in decline -- but the question marks in the bullpen and the nonentities likely to be playing in the corners almost certainly make them a non-contending team this year. Even though Hendry will eventually catch flak for trading Sosa once the team falls out of it, and even though the Jayson Starks of the world will blame their collapse on the lack of veteran leadership only Sosa could have provided, the real problem was to be found in the late innings pitching the team lacked for three straight years. Dusty can't be blamed for that, but it sure doesn't help to see valuable parts kicked out the back door with so many other things going wrong, and unaddressed, at the same time.

Comments:
Rob, I'm a day late with this but happy one year anniversary. I daresay the Dodger blogs are the very best in the baseball blog bidness but me being a Dodger fan, I'm biased.

All the best,

Suffering Bruin
 
Really? Heh, I would have said Seattle, frankly, but I'll take the compliment. Better days for the Blue, I'm a-hopin'.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2