<$BlogRSDURL$>
Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.

Wednesday, December 07, 2005

Roster Notes


Comments:
Regarding OC, why would we sign Aurilia when we have 2 SS prospects waiting in the minors. Let Chone play SS until they are ready.
 
I think it's interesting that the Dodgers are mentioned in connection with just about every possible trade or free agent signing available. Is Coletti really this busy -- Ramirez, Soriano, Garciaparra, Wells, Morris, etc. -- and is McCourt really this open with his checkbook? Or is this some sort of PR spin to improve the owner's image by making us think they're willing to spend whatever it takes to win? I'm skeptical.
 
Offering arbitration to Byrd, Bengie and Washburn should be no-brainers.

The reason for offering arbitration to Bengie and Washburn is the same: if they accept, the Angels get a one-year rental of a very useful player. If they decline, the Angels get a draft pick or two (for Bengie).

I hope the report is wrong about not offering arbitration to Washburn.
 
I think Aurilia would fill the super-sub role that Figgins currently has, freeing up Figgy to play SS.
 
Cigarcow -- marketing, to be sure, but some small fraction may be real.
 
The best Angel article of the day appeared in the Riverside Press Enterprise (www.pe.com). It seems the Angels are . . . unlikely to obtain a big bat due to Stoneman's unwillingness to give up prospects; are more likely to obtain a pitcher; and, in very good news, will probably move Erstad back to center to make way for Kotchman. Be sure to read it.
 
I read someplace that the Angels might pick up Aurillia in the event they give up Figgins in a trade. He'd become an all-purpose utility guy.
 
Anon -- will blog about that later, but you're right, it's the big news of the day.
 

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.



Newer›  ‹Older
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?
Google

WWW 6-4-2