Proceeds from the ads below will be donated to the
Bob Wuesthoff scholarship fund.
Saturday, February 11, 2006 |
Ned Colletti, Traitor
Comments:
What concerns me more is that the ring is the LOSERS RING. NED,The Giants lost. No one wears the losers ring.
What does it say about a guy who insists on wearing a ring that commemorates his contribution as an ASSISTANT GM to the biggest choke in WS history.
bad sign.
What does it say about a guy who insists on wearing a ring that commemorates his contribution as an ASSISTANT GM to the biggest choke in WS history.
bad sign.
# posted by 
: 2/11/2006 10:13:00 PM
: 2/11/2006 10:13:00 PM
And the ring represents props to the Dodgers OTHER rival - that it now officially shares its L.A. with - in that it represents the Angels' historic biggest comeback in WS history.
# posted by : 2/12/2006 12:19:00 AM
: 2/12/2006 12:19:00 AM
It's never a bad thing to project an image of success and highlight your accomplishments.
The Giant sitgma is already there with him having worked for them so long, so I don't think wearing a ring isn't going to do any additional "harm".
The Giant sitgma is already there with him having worked for them so long, so I don't think wearing a ring isn't going to do any additional "harm".
I like the previous comment. Success breeds success, so maybe our lounge act singer, is just a bottomline optimist.
John, there is no one in baseball(other than Ned) that looks at that ring and thinks success. In fact quite the opposite.
# posted by : 2/12/2006 02:20:00 PM
: 2/12/2006 02:20:00 PM
In Ned's defense, it looks to me like he just can't get the damned thing off. That still, however, doesn't explain why he ever even tried it on.
# posted by : 2/13/2006 10:39:00 AM
: 2/13/2006 10:39:00 AMNewer› ‹Older
 |
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.